Study Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of ketamine compared with fe
ntanyl as analgesia or sedation for microlaparoscopy.
Design. Prospective, randomized study (Canadian Task Force classification I
).
Setting. University-affiliated hospital.
Patients. Forty-one infertile women.
Interventions. Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to have analgesia
with fentanyl and 20 sedation with ketamine during microlaparoscopy. Maxim
um doses were 0.2 and 200 mg, respectively. Local anesthesia was provided w
ith 0.25% bupivacaine 5 ml injected into cannula sites.
Measurements and Main Results. Abnormal findings such as endometriosis and
periadnexal adhesions were identified in 24 patients. Ablation, coagulation
, and adhesiolysis were easily performed in 14 (82.4%) of 17 women receivin
g ketamine, but difficulties were encountered in operating on 16 patients r
eceiving fentanyl. Ketamine was administered to 10 patients (47.6%) in the
fentanyl group because anxiety and pain were not sufficiently controlled by
fentanyl. There were no significant differences in visual analog scale sco
res and recovery time between groups. On questionnaire, 19 (95%) of 20 pati
ents receiving ketamine indicated they would choose the same anesthesia aga
in if offered, compared with only 4 (19%) of 21 receiving fentanyl (p<0.001
).
Conclusion. Microlaparoscopy in infertile women was performed more effectiv
ely under sedation with ketamine than with fentanyl.