Study Objective. To assess complications and subjective outcomes after adne
xal surgery by laparotomy and laparoscopy.
Design. Observational study (Canadian Task Force classification 11-2).
Setting. University-affiliated hospital.
Patients. Two-hundred twenty-eight women requiring adnexal surgery for beni
gn indications.
Interventions, The 114 patients who underwent laparotomy and 114 having lap
aroscopy were followed prospectively for 1 year. Two questionnaire-based ev
aluations were undertaken to determine subjective outcomes. To evaluate pos
sible later surgical procedures, hospital records were reviewed 4 years aft
er operation.
Measurements and Main Results. No major complications occurred in the lapar
otomy group. The two (1.8%) in the laparoscopy group were intestinal injury
and aortal injury both in women who had previously undergone laparotomy. R
ates of minor complications were 11.4% for laparotomy and 7.0% for laparosc
opy. Two patients in both groups were readmitted. No difference was found b
etween groups in need for additional adnexal procedures up to 4 years after
operation. After 1 year, frequencies of subjective complaints and satisfac
tion with surgical procedure did not differ significantly Mean hospital cos
t per patient was less for laparoscopy than for laparotomy.
Conclusion. No statistically significant differences were seen after adnexa
l surgery by laparoscopy and laparotomy with regard to frequency of complic
ations and subjective outcomes. Laparoscopy in women who have previously un
dergone laparotomy may be associated with a slightly greater risk of major
complications than another laparotomy.