OBJECTIVES The study was done to determine the most "cost-effective" approa
ch to follow adults after repair of coarctation of the aorta.
BACKGROUND Recoarctation and/or aneurysm formation following surgical repai
r or angioplasty for coarctation of the aorta carry a significant morbidity
and mortality. Various screening tests to detect such complications are us
ed, but little is known of their sensitivities and specificities; as a cons
equence, the most "cost-effective" approach to follow such patients is unde
fined.
METHODS Retrospective analysis was done on the sensitivity and specificity
of symptomatology, physical examination, electrocardiogram, chest radiograp
h, exercise testing and transthoracic echocardiography to detect recoarctat
ion and/or aneurysm formation in 84 adult patients following surgical repai
r or angioplasty of coarctation of the aorta, using magnetic resonance imag
ing (MRI) as the gold standard test.
RESULTS Echocardiography had the highest sensitivity in detecting recoarcta
tion (87%) and chest radiograph the highest sensitivity in detecting aneury
sm formation (67%). Combined clinical visit and echocardiography had a high
sensitivity for diagnosing recoarctation and/or aneurysm formation (97%),
but performing a clinical visit and an MRT on every patient without any pri
or screening test emerged as the most "cost-effective" strategy.
CONCLUSIONS The most "cost-effective" approach to diagnose complications at
the site of repair in patients after surgical repair or balloon angioplast
y of coarctation of the aorta appears to be the combination of clinical ass
essment and MRI scan on every patient. If MRT resources are scant, performi
ng a clinical assessment plus a transthoracic echocardiography and an MRT o
n patients with positive results is an acceptable alternative. (C) 2000 by
the American College of Cardiology.