PURPOSE: To use quantitative ultrasonographic measurements to compare the e
ffect of a polymeric coating designed to increase needle echogenicity to co
mmercially available needles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Commercially available standard smooth and dimpled e
chogenic tip 21-gauge needles established reference levels of echogenicity
in gelatin-based and turkey breast phantoms, Examples of both types of need
les were coated with a thin polymeric film that utilizes entrapped microbub
bles of air on its surface to increase echogenicity, Samples of each type i
n both coated and noncoated versions were placed in phantoms in matched pos
itions and imaged with clinical ultrasound machines, Similar numbers of eac
h category were evaluated at various angles of insonation for a total of 10
9 images. Similar numbers of each category were imaged at B-minute interval
s for up to 38 minutes for a total of 226 images. Images were recorded, dig
itized, and evaluated for relative echo strength in arbitrary echogenic bri
ghtness units.
RESULTS: Coating increased peak echogenicity over the entire needle to a le
vel that closely approximates the peak echogenicity of dimpled needle tips
(means: dimpled = 834, coated smooth = 803, coated dimpled = 823; P = .54),
Smooth is lower than this group at 468 (P = .0001), Representative area ec
hogenicity increased with coating or dimpling (smooth = 377 vs coated smoot
h = 778, coated dimpled = 690, dimpled = 775; P = .0001), Coating increased
peak values 74% and area values 95% compared to smooth. Decreased angles o
f insonation moderately reduced echogenicity on coated smooth, coated dimpl
ed, and dimpled, while it decreased to below good visibility threshold on s
tandard smooth needles. The echogenicity of the coated needles fades in sal
ine with time (l%/min).
CONCLUSION: Objective measurements show that this coating significantly inc
reases echogenicity of entire needles to match that obtained with a dimpled
tip.