Purpose: The effectiveness of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in prevent
ing pulmonary embolism while preserving caval flow is significantly affecte
d by its hemodynamic characteristics. Flow fields surrounding two types of
IVC filters were compared to assess how the design of a filter may influenc
e performance.
Methods: The 12F Titanium Greenfield and VenaTech LGM inferior vena cava fi
lters were studied in vitro with a noninvasive flow visualization technique
, the photochromic flow visualization and measurement technique. Axial velo
city profiles and wall shear stress distributions were measured. These resu
lts were compared with analytical data corresponding to the flow field in t
he absence of a filter to determine the relative extent of the flow disturb
ances.
Results: The reductions in near-wall axial velocity and wall shear stress c
aused by the VenaTech filter were more extensive and severe than those caus
ed by the Greenfield filter. These changes were the consequence of differen
ces in the geometry and dimensions of the struts of the two filters. The me
asurements showed the flow fields to be laminar, with no evidence of turbul
ence in both cases.
Conclusion: Two factors that have been linked to thrombogenesis, near-wall
velocity and wall-shear stress, were significantly affected by the larger f
rontal profile area of the VenaTech filter. Although a larger area may incr
ease clot-trapping efficiency, as shown by previous studies, the reduced ne
ar-wall velocities and wall shear stresses may increase the potential for t
hrombogenesis and, thus, caval occlusion. In contrast to other in vitro flo
w visualization studies, no turbulence was observed with either filter.