The very little plastic deformation exhibited in the fracturing of flake gr
aphite (FG) and compacted graphite (CG) cast irons qualified them as brittl
e materials. The fatigue pre-cracking of these brittle material in K-1C pla
ne strain fracture toughness testing is a difficult task. Opposed to this s
tatic toughness K-1C, the dynamic toughness obtained by impact testing does
not have such problems. Since the stress-strain behavior of brittle materi
al is essentially linear and the fracture appearance of the specimens after
impact testing must largely be flat without shear-lip, these conditions al
so satisfy the linear-elastic requirement in K-1C testing. Thus, it is of i
nterest to find out if there's any linear relationship existed between thes
e two toughness properties of brittle material. Annealing, normalizing, and
austempering heat treatment were applied to FG and CG irons to alter their
matrix structures so as to obtain a range of static (K-1C) and dynamic (im
pact) toughness values. A third toughness, calculated by integrating the ar
ea under the load versus CGD (Clip Gage Displacement) curve in K-1C testing
, was termed 'calculated toughness' and was also listed for comparison purp
oses. It was found, among dynamic impact toughness (X), static K-1C (Y), an
d calculated toughness (Z), linear relationships exist for flake graphite c
ast iron as: Y = 4.02X - 0.81 Z = 1.75X + 2.99 and for compacted graphite c
ast iron as: Y = 0.86X + 20.2 Z = 0.77X + 4.77. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S
.A. All rights reserved.