Changes in glutamine and glutamate concentrations for tracking training tolerance

Citation
Dj. Smith et Sr. Norris, Changes in glutamine and glutamate concentrations for tracking training tolerance, MED SCI SPT, 32(3), 2000, pp. 684-689
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
ISSN journal
01959131 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
684 - 689
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-9131(200003)32:3<684:CIGAGC>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose was to monitor high-performance athletes throughout tr aining macrocycles and competitions and examine the changes in plasma gluta mine (Gm) and glutamate (Ga) concentrations in order to develop a model of tolerance to training. Methods: Plasma glutamine and glutamate concentratio ns of 52 National team athletes; (31 male and 21 female) divided into male and female groups of speed skating, swimming, and cross-country skiing were measured in an early season rested condition to determine highest Gm and l owest Ga concentrations and over 2-4 macrocycles, which included heavy trai ning to establish lowest Gm and highest Ga concentrations. Results: In the rested condition, there were no differences within and between the male and female groups, excluding five athletes (OTA) who became overtrained in hea vy training. The mean (+/-SD) Gm concentration was 585 +/- 54 mu mol.L-1, G a concentration 101 +/- 16 mu mol.L-1, and Gm/Ga ratio 5.88 +/- 0.84 mu mol .L-1. The OTA had a significantly higher Ga concentration of 128 +/- 16 mu mol.L-1 and lower Gm/Ga ratio of 4.43 +/- 0.49 mu mol.L-1 than all the othe r groups. In heavy training, there was a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in Gm concentration to 522 +/- 53 (mu mol.L-1, significant increase in Ga con centration to 128 +/- 19 (mu mol.L-1 and significant decrease in Gm/Ga rati o to 4.15 +/- 0.51 mu mol.L-1. The OTA Crm concentration of 488 +/- 31 mu m ol.L-1 was significant lower than only the male speed skating and swimming groups. However, the Ga concentration of 171 +/- 17 mu mol.L-1 and Gm/Ga ra tio of 2.88 +/- 0.27 mu mol.L-1 were significantly higher and lower respect ively than all other groups. Conclusions: Based on the changes in Gm and Ga concentration under different training conditions, we propose an athlete t olerance to training model where glutamine concentration reflects tolerance to volume of work and glutamate concentration reflects tolerance to high i ntensity training. We suggest that the Gm/Ga ratio may globally represent o verall tolerance to training.