AN ELECTROPHORETIC ANALYSIS OF PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN CLOACINA-CLARKAE, CLOACINA-COMMUNIS, CLOACINA-PETROGALE AND CLOACINA-SIMILIS (NEMATODA, STRONGYLOIDEA) FROM MACROPODID MARSUPIALS
Nb. Chilton et al., AN ELECTROPHORETIC ANALYSIS OF PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN CLOACINA-CLARKAE, CLOACINA-COMMUNIS, CLOACINA-PETROGALE AND CLOACINA-SIMILIS (NEMATODA, STRONGYLOIDEA) FROM MACROPODID MARSUPIALS, International journal for parasitology, 27(5), 1997, pp. 483-493
An electrophoretic study was conducted on Cloacina clarkae, C. communi
s, C. petrogale and C. similis based on 19 enzyme loci, C. communis wa
s widely distributed in Macropus robustus, showing some genetic variat
ion among populations but occasionally switching to other macropodid h
osts (M. agilis, M. antilopinus). C. similis occurred in members of th
e Petrogale penicillata complex, Macropus dorsalis and Thylogale billa
udierii, but showed no evidence of genetic differentiation in spite of
its occurrence in different host species and in geographically distin
ct regions of Australia. C. clarkae from Macropus eugenii was genetica
lly indistinguishable from C. similis and was considered synonymous wi
th it, C. petrogale occurred in a similarly diverse range of hosts and
geographical regions to C. similis, but was represented electrophoret
ically as 4 distinct genetic species, 1 in Petrogale assimilis, a seco
nd in P. lateralis purpureicollis, a third in Macropus parryi in Queen
sland and a fourth in M. eugenii in South Australia. Although the host
and geographical ranges of C. similis and C. petrogale are analogous,
the genetic uniformity of the former and diversity of the latter illu
strate the incomplete understanding we have of the immediate causes of
speciation in nematodes. (C) 1997 Australian Society for Parasitology
.