Ag. Martin et al., ANALYSIS OF IMMUNOLOGICAL CROSS-PROTECTION AND SENSITIVITIES TO ANTICOCCIDIAL DRUGS AMONG 5 GEOGRAPHICAL AND TEMPORAL STRAINS OF EIMERIA-MAXIMA, International journal for parasitology, 27(5), 1997, pp. 527-533
Two laboratory strains (USDA strain No. 68 isolated from the eastern s
hore of Maryland 15 Sears ago and a University of Guelph strain isolat
ed from an Ontario broiler house 23 years ago) and 3 recent field stra
ins of Eimeria maxima [isolated in Maryland (MD), North Carolina (NC)
and Florida (FL)] mere tested for their ability to induce cross-protec
tive immunity and their sensitivities to a variety of anticoccidial co
mpounds, To assess immunological cross-protection, 1-day-old chicks me
re inoculated and subsequently challenged at 10 days of age, testing a
ll possible combinations of initial inoculating (immunizing) and subse
quent challenge strain, Six days post-challenge, chicks were killed an
d weight gains and lesion scores were determined and compared to sham
inoculated and challenged, and sham challenged age-matched controls. T
he 2 laboratory strains and the NC strain were fully cross-protective
against each other by both these measures. In contrast, the MD and FL
strains induced complete protection only against the homologous strain
. Reciprocally, no other strains protected chicks completely against t
he FL and MD strains. Drug sensitivity studies using 10 different anti
coccidial formulations at prescribed drug levels showed significant di
fferences between the 2 laboratory strains and the 3 recently isolated
field strains; more recent isolates from commercial broiler houses de
monstrated complete or partial resistance to a wider range of anticocc
idial compounds. No correlation was seen between cross-protection and
sensitivities to anticoccidials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.