We evaluate the empirical and theoretical support for the hypothesis that a
large proportion of native species richness is required to maximize ecosys
tem stability and sustain function. This assessment is important for conser
vation strategies because sustenance of ecosystem functions has been used a
s an argument for the conservation of species. If ecosystem functions are s
ustained at relatively low species richness, then arguing for the conservat
ion of ecosystem function, no matter how important in its own right, does n
ot strongly argue for the conservation of species. Additionally, for this t
o be a strong conservation argument the link between species diversity and
ecosystem functions of value to the human community must be clear. We revie
w the empirical literature to quantify the support for two hypotheses: (1)
species richness is positively correlated with ecosystem function, and (2)
ecosystem functions do not saturate at low species richness relative to the
observed or experimental diversity. Few empirical studies demonstrate impr
oved function at high levels of species richness, Second, we analyze recent
theoretical models in order to estimate the level of species richness requ
ired to maintain ecosystem function. Again we find that, within a single tr
ophic level, most mathematical models predict saturation of ecosystem funct
ion at a low proportion of local species richness. We also analyze a theore
tical model linking species number to ecosystem stability. This model predi
cts that species richness beyond the first few species does not typically i
ncrease ecosystem stability. One reason that high species richness may not
contribute significantly to function or stability is that most communities
are characterized by strong dominance such that a few species provide the v
ast majority of the community biomass. Rapid turnover of species may rescue
the concept that diversity leads to maximum function and stability. The ro
le of turnover in ecosystem function and stability has not been investigate
d. Despite the recent rush to embrace the linkage between biodiversity and
ecosystem function, we find little support for the hypothesis that there is
a strong dependence of ecosystem function on the full complement of divers
ity within sites. Given this observation, the conservation community should
take a cautious view of endorsing this linkage as a model to promote conse
rvation goals.