Jm. Bryson et Sr. Anderson, Applying large-group interaction methods in the planning and implementation of major change efforts, PUBL ADM RE, 60(2), 2000, pp. 143-162
Public policy makers, planners, and managers are increasingly relying on wh
at might be called large-group interaction methods to involve large numbers
of people (from as few as eight to more than 2,000) in planning and implem
enting major change efforts. These methods are structured processes for eng
aging large numbers of people to: (1) enhance the amount of relevant inform
ation brought to bear on a problem; (2) build commitment to problem definit
ions and solutions; (3) fuse planning and implementation; and (4) shorten t
he amount of time needed to conceive and execute major policies, programs,
services, or projects. Proponents of such methods claim that they provide s
ets of concepts, procedures, and fools that can help public and nonprofit o
rganizations and communities deal effectively with change. On the other han
d, a number of boundary conditions surround the successful use of the metho
ds. The authors compare and contrast seven approaches most frequently used
in the public sector in the United States and abroad (i.e., Real Time Strat
egic Change, Search Conferences, Future Searches, Strategic Options Develop
ment and Analysis, Strategic Choice, Technology of Participation, and Open
Space Technology) to illustrate their comparative strengths and weaknesses
and to develop an agenda for research.