A prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study of ropivacaine 0.75% versus bupivacaine 0.5%-mepivacaine 2% for peribulbar anesthesia

Citation
M. Luchetti et al., A prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study of ropivacaine 0.75% versus bupivacaine 0.5%-mepivacaine 2% for peribulbar anesthesia, REG ANES PA, 25(2), 2000, pp. 195-200
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10987339 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
195 - 200
Database
ISI
SICI code
1098-7339(200003/04)25:2<195:APRDCS>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Ropivacaine 1% has recently been used in clinica l trials for peribulbar anesthesia. This study aims to compare the safety a nd the efficacy of ropivacaine 0.75% with that of a 1:1 mixture of bupivaca ine 0.5% and mepivacaine 2% for peribulbar anesthesia. Methods: Two thousand patients undergoing peribulbar anesthesia for electiv e cataract phacoemulsification were prospectively studied over a 1-year per iod and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups according to the local anestheti c used. One thousand patients were administered peribulbar anesthesia with 9 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 1 mt of hyaluronidase (group R), and 1,000 p atients received peribulbar anesthesia with 4 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% plus 4 mL of mepivacaine 2% plus 1 mL of hyaluronidase plus 1 mL of sodium bicarb onate (group BM). Peribulbar anesthesia was always accomplished by the same physician by 2 injections of 5 mL each, with a 25-gauge 25-mm needle. Eval uation was performed by another physician blinded to the technique used and included assessment of pain on local anesthetic injection, ocular and eyel id akinesia, need for top-up injections, onset time and duration of anesthe sia, intraoperative analgesia, duration of surgery, hemodynamic parameters, and incidence of perioperative complications. Results: A greater incidence of pain on injection was found in group BM (P < .001). No difference between the groups was found regarding the onset tim e and the duration of anesthesia. Perioperative analgesia was satisfactory in both groups with no significant difference. Patients in group R showed a reduced need for top-up injection and a better ocular akinesia at 8 and 10 minutes (P < .01). The akinesia of the eyelid was comparable in the 2 grou ps and complete in all cases at 8 minutes. Cardiac arrhythmias were more fr equent in group BM (P < .01). Local complications did not differ between th e groups. An increase in mean artierial blood pressure and heart rate was o bserved in both groups 1 minute after injection of local anesthetic. Conclusions: Peribulbar anesthesia with ropivacaine provided better ocular akinesia 8 to 10 minutes after block insertion than a bupivacaine-mepivacai ne mixture, which reduced the need for top-up injections. Ropivacaine also caused less pain on injection.