This work investigates the application of genetic algorithm (GA)-based sear
ch techniques to concurrent assembly planning, where product design and ass
embly process planning are performed in parallel, and the evaluation of a d
esign configuration is influenced by the performance of its related assembl
y process. Several types of GAs and an exhaustive combinatorial approach ar
e compared, in terms of reliability and speed in locating the global optimu
m. The different algorithms are tested first on a set of artificially gener
ated assembly planning problems, which are intended to represent a broad sp
ectrum of combinatorial complexity; then an industrial case study is presen
ted. Test problems indicate that GAs are slightly less reliable than the co
mbinatorial approach in finding the global, but are capable of identifying
solutions which are very close to the global optimum with consistency, soon
outperforming the combinatorial approach in terms of execution times, as t
he problem complexity grows. For an industrial case study of low combinator
ial complexity, such as the one chosen in this work, GAs and combinatorial
approach perform almost equivalently, both in terms of reliability and spee
d. In summary, GAs seem a suitable choice for those planning applications w
here response time is an important factor, and results which are close enou
gh to the global optimum are still considered acceptable such as in concurr
ent assembly planning, where response time is a key factor when assessing t
he validity of a product design configuration in terms of the performance o
f its assembly plan. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.