What do case managers do? An investigation of case manager interventions and their relationship to client outcome

Citation
T. Bjorkman et L. Hansson, What do case managers do? An investigation of case manager interventions and their relationship to client outcome, SOC PSY PSY, 35(1), 2000, pp. 43-50
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry
Journal title
SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
09337954 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
43 - 50
Database
ISI
SICI code
0933-7954(200001)35:1<43:WDCMDA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Background: The aim of the present study, which forms part of a wider case management multicenter study, was to explore the content of case managers' work, service patterns, and their relationship to client outcome. Methods: Client background characteristics were registered at admission, and needs o f care and psychosocial functioning were assessed at admission to the servi ce and after Is months. In seven of the services an extended follow-up was performed, which included assessments regarding quality of life, level of s ymptoms and social network. The study comprised 176 severely mentally ill c lients, of whom 153 participated in a general 18-month follow-up (87%), wit h 113 clients out of 134 participating in an extended follow-up sample (84% ). Results: The investigation of service patterns showed that clients recei ved services in a great variety of life areas using a number of different t ypes of interventions. The results support the assumption that severely men tally ill clients are in need of case management services that offer more t han brokerage services and coordination. A more active rehabilitation-orien ted approach was found towards younger clients and clients who had a job, w hich may reflect a higher level of ambition in assisting younger clients to gain access to and stay in education and the labor market. Several types o f intervention were related to client outcome. Brokerage, intervention plan ning and more interventions in the area of skills relating to activities of daily living were related to a more pronounced decrease in needs of care. More time spent on indirect work on behalf of the clients was related to a better outcome with regard to psychiatric symptoms and social network. Conc lusions: The results indicate that specific service components have a more obvious distinct impact than others on outcome, and that this increase in e ffectiveness varies with the outcome targeted.