Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios

Authors
Citation
Bj. Biggerstaff, Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios, STAT MED, 19(5), 2000, pp. 649-663
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
ISSN journal
02776715 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
649 - 663
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-6715(20000315)19:5<649:CDTASG>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The diagnostic abilities of two or more diagnostic tests are traditionally compared by their respective sensitivities and specificities, either separa tely or using a summary of them such as Youden's index. Several authors hav e argued that the likelihood ratios provide a more appropriate, if in pract ice a less intuitive, comparison. We present a simple graphic which incorpo rates all these measures and admits easily interpreted comparison of two or more diagnostic tests. We show, using likelihood ratios and this graphic, that a test can be superior to a competitor in terms of predictive values w hile having either sensitivity or specificity smaller. A decision theoretic basis for the interpretation of the graph is given by relating it to the t ent graph of Hilden and Glasziou (Statistics in Medicine, 1996). Finally, a brief example comparing two serodiagnostic tests for Lyme disease is prese nted. Published in 2000 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.