An economic analysis of binomial sampling for weed scouting

Full-count random sampling has been the traditional method of obtaining wee d densities. Currently it is the recommended scouting procedure when using HERB, a herbicide selection decision aid. However, alternative methods of s couring that are quicker and more economical need to be investigated. One p ossibility that has been considered is binomial sampling. Binomial sampling is the procedure by which density is estimated from the number of random q uadrats in which the count of individuals is equal to or less than a specif ied cutoff value. This sampling method has been widely used for insect scou ting. There has also been interest in using binomial sampling for weed scou ting. However, an economic analysis of this sampling method for weeds has n ot been performed. In this paper, the results of an economic analysis using simulations with binomial sampling and the HERB model are presented. Full- count sampling was included in the simulations to provide a benchmark for c omparison. The comparison was made in terms of economic losses incurred whe n the estimated weed density obtained from sampling was inaccurate and a he rbicide treatment was selected that did not maximize profits. These types o f losses are referred to as opportunity losses. The opportunity losses obta ined from the simulations indicate that in some situations binomial samplin g may be a viable economic alternative to full-count sampling for fields wi th weed populations that follow a negative binomial distribution, assuming no prior knowledge of weed densities or negative binomial k values.