PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE UROSELECTIVE ALPHA-1 ANTAGONIST REC-15 2739 (SB-216469) - ROLE OF THE ALPHA-1L ADRENOCEPTOR IN TISSUE SELECTIVITY .2./
R. Testa et al., PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE UROSELECTIVE ALPHA-1 ANTAGONIST REC-15 2739 (SB-216469) - ROLE OF THE ALPHA-1L ADRENOCEPTOR IN TISSUE SELECTIVITY .2./, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 281(3), 1997, pp. 1284-1293
The aim of the present work was to investigate whether or not the uros
electivity of Rec 15/2739 and several other alpha-1 adrenoceptor (alph
a(1)-AR) antagonists observed in the anesthetized dog could be related
to selectivity of these compounds far a particular alpha-1 AR subtype
. The binding affinity of the tested compounds for canine prostate alp
ha-1 ARs and their in vitro functional affinity for the alpha-1 ARs of
rabbit urethra and prostate correlated with their functional affinity
for the alpha-1L AR subtype, but not with the binding affinity for re
combinant animal and human alpha-1a, alpha-1b and alpha-1d AR subtypes
. Similar results were obtained when the in vivo potency on urethral p
ressure was correlated with the affinity for the alpha-1 AR subtypes;
also in this case alpha-1L AR gave the best correlation. No correlatio
n was obtained by considering the other alpha-1 AR subtypes. The in vi
vo hypotensive effects observed in dog after i.v. administration of th
e considered compounds correlated only with the binding affinity for t
he animal and human alpha-1d subtype. In conclusion, the results shown
in the present paper indicate that the potencies of different alpha-1
antagonists against the contractions induced by norepinephrine on tis
sues of the lower urinary tract of rabbits and dogs are better correla
ted with their affinity for the putative alpha-1L subtype than for the
alpha-1a subtype. Only the compounds showing selectivity for the alph
a-1L subtype versus the alpha-1d subtype proved highly selective in vi
vo for the lower urinary tract versus the vascular tissues.