A. Heidenreich et al., Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (M. Ormond). Review of current diagnostic and therapeutic concepts, AKT UROL, 31(1), 2000, pp. 1-9
Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is an uncommon inflammatory disease of the r
etroperitoneum leading to extensive fibrosis with consecutive obstruction o
f adjacent organs, namely the ureters. Since no consensus on the standard t
herapy exists, the aim of this paper is to critically review the diagnostic
and therapeutic concepts presented in the literature.
Computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the pr
eferred imaging procedures for diagnosis and follow-up after initiation of
immunosuppressive therapy: periaortic fibrotic tissue masses exhibiting 30
to 50 HE are characteristic features of primary RPF on native CT scans. CT
findings and pathohistology correlate very well: central areas of low, but
constant, densities resemble fibrotic, avascular tissue, whereas peripheral
regions with higher HE numbers resemble inflammatory, well vascularized ti
ssues. MRI appears to be more sensitive than CT scans. T-1-weighted images
exhibit masses isotense with the kidney and muscle. However, T-2-weighted i
mages demonstrate higher signal intensities in the inflammatory stage of RP
F, whereas the fibrotic stage is characterized by a decreased signal intens
ity as compared to kidney and muscle.
Initial therapy of primary RPF consists of endoluminal or percutaneous urin
ary diversion to protect renal function followed by immunosuppressive thera
py with prednison and/or azathioprin for at least 3 months. Follow-up CT fi
ndings dictate the management thereafter: persistent acute inflammatory RPF
should be treated by immunosuppressive combination therapy, whereas fibrot
ic masses are best managed by a surgical approach.
Surgical management of primary RPF should be initiated in the fibrotic stag
e only. Ureterolysis and intraperitonealisation followed by a month course
of adjuvant immunsuppressive therapy results in a continuous complete remis
sion of more than 90%. Wrapping of the ureter with omentum maius is only re
commended if wrapping is performed from the renal pelvis to the bladder. Re
nal autotransplantation and ureteral ileal replacement are rarely performed
nowadays and are only indicated in case of severe ureteral injury.