Quantitative measurements of medical images for pharmaceutical clinical trials: Comparison between on-site and off-site assessments

Citation
D. Sahani et al., Quantitative measurements of medical images for pharmaceutical clinical trials: Comparison between on-site and off-site assessments, AM J ROENTG, 174(4), 2000, pp. 1159-1162
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
ISSN journal
0361803X → ACNP
Volume
174
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1159 - 1162
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-803X(200004)174:4<1159:QMOMIF>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
OBJECTIVE, In pharmaceutical clinical trials, quantitative measurements on medical images are often conducted to confirm drug efficacy. This study aim s to compare the quantitative image analysis performance of an off-site cor e laboratory with the performance of investigators from multiple clinical s ites. MATERIALS AND METHODS, In a phase I clinical trial, 25 healthy subjects und erwent dynamic brain single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) sci ntigraphy with I-123-Altropane, a cocaine analogue with high affinity and s electivity for dopamine transporter sites in the striatum, In 20 patients e xamined on-site and off-site, a total of 80 measurements were made to calcu late the drug's binding potential. A trained technologist off-site at a cen tral core laboratory and on-site investigators at different clinical sites performed the image analysis. These results were compared with measurements made by a subspecialty radiologist whose assessments were the reference st andard. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple regression analys is. RESULTS. Measurements from the central core laboratory (off-site) highly co rrelated (r = 0.95) with measurements of the reference standard. Measuremen ts from the clinical sites (on-site) grouped together had lower correlation (r = 0.84) with the reference standard. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), CONCLUSION. Training and experience in the specific type of image analysis are critical in obtaining consistent data. Quantitative analysis by dedicat ed personnel at a core laboratory provides highly reproducible results. The findings support off-site assessment of medical images in pharmaceutical c linical trials.