We review recent empirical evidence that shows political campaigns are more
potent than widely believed, focusing on the conceptual and methodological
advances that have produced these findings. Conceptually, a broader defini
tion of effects-that includes learning and agenda-control, as well as vote
choice-characterizes contemporary research. This research also features two
kinds of interactive models that are more complex than the traditional hyp
odermic (message-based) approach. The resonance model considers the relatio
nship between message content and receivers' predispositions, while the str
ategic model highlights the interactions between competing messages. Finall
y, we attribute the emergence of stronger evidence in favor of campaign eff
ects to the use of new methodologies including experimentation and content
analysis, as well as the more sophisticated use of sample surveys.