D. Andes et M. Van Ogtrop, In vivo characterization of the pharmacodynamics of flucytosine in a neutropenic murine disseminated candidiasis model, ANTIM AG CH, 44(4), 2000, pp. 938-942
In vivo pharmacodynamic parameters have been characterized for a variety of
antibacterial agents. These parameters have been studied in correlation wi
th in vivo outcomes in order to determine (i) which dosing parameter is pre
dictive of outcome and (ii) the magnitude of that parameter associated with
efficacy. Very little is known of the pharmacodynamics of antifungal agent
s. We used a neutropenic murine model of disseminated candidiasis to correl
ate the pharmacodynamic parameters (percentage of time above the MIG, area
under the concentration-time curve [AUC]/MIC and peak level/MIG) for flucyt
osine (5-FC) in vivo with efficacy as measured by organism number in homoge
nized kidney cultures after 24 h of therapy. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FC i
n infected mice were linear. Serum half-lives ranged from 0.36 to 0.43 h, I
nfection was achieved by intravenous inoculation of 10(6) CFU of yeast cell
s per mi via the lateral tail vein of neutropenic mice. Groups of mice were
treated with fourfold escalating total doses of 5-FC ranging from 1.56 to
400 mg/kg of body weight/day divided into one, two, four, or eight doses ov
er 24 h. Increasing doses produced minimal concentration dependent killing
ranging from 0 to 0.9 log(10) CFU/kidneys. 5-FC did, however, produce a dos
e-dependent suppression of growth after levels in serum had fallen below th
e MIG. The fungistatic dose increased from 6 to 8 mg/kg with dosing every 3
and 6 h to 70 mg/kg at with dosing every 24 h, Nonlinear regression analys
is was used to determine which pharmacodynamic parameter best correlated wi
th efficacy, Time above the MIC was the parameter best predictive of outcom
e, while AUC/MIC was only slightly less predictive (time above MIG, R-2 = 8
5%; AUC/MIC, R-2 = 77%; peak level/MIC, R-2 = 53%), Maximal efficacy was ob
served when levels exceeded the MTC for only 20 to 25% of the dosing interv
al. If one considers drug kinetics in humans, these results suggest reevalu
ation of current dosing regimens.