Background: Abdominal palpation during physical examination is an important
means of detecting abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but limited informatio
n is available on its accuracy.
Methods: Two hundred subjects (aged 51-88 years), 99 with and 101 without A
AA as determined by previous ultrasound, each underwent physical examinatio
n of the abdomen by 2 internists who were blinded to each other's findings
and to the ultrasound diagnosis.
Results: The overall accuracy of abdominal palpation for detecting AAA was
as follows: sensitivity, 68% (95% confidence interval [CI],60%-76%); specif
icity, 75% (95% CI, 68%-82%); positive-likelihood ratio, 2.7 (95% CI, 2.0-3
.6); negative likelihood ratio 0.43 (95% CI, 0.33-0.56). Interobserver pair
agreement for AAA vs no AAA between the first and second examinations was
77% (kappa = 0.53). Sensitivity increased with AAA diameter, from 61% for A
AAs of 3.0 to 3.9 cm, to 69% for AAAs of 4.0 to 4.9 cm, 72% for AAAs of 4.0
cm or larger, and 82% for AAAs of 5.0 cm or larger. Sensitivity in subject
s with an abdominal girth less than 100 cm (40-in waistline) was 91% vs 53%
for girth of 100 cm or greater (P<.001). When girth was 100 cm or greater
and the aorta was palpable, sensitivity was 82%. When girth was less than 1
00 cm and the AAA was 5.0 cm or larger, sensitivity was 100% (12 examinatio
ns). Factors independently associated with correct examination findings inc
luded AAA diameter (odds ratio [OR], 1.95 per centimeter increase; 95% CI,
1.06-3.58); abdominal girth (OR, 0.90 per centimeter in crease; 95% CI, 0.8
7-0.94); and the examiner's assessment that the abdomen was not tight (OR,
2.68; 95% CI, 1.17-6.13).
Conclusions: Abdominal palpation has only moderate overall sensitivity for
detecting AAA, but appears to be highly sensitive for diagnosis of AAAs lar
ge enough to warrant elective intervention in patients who do not have a la
rge girth. Abdominal palpation has good sensitivity even in patients with a
large girth if the aorta is palpable.