Br. Howard et al., Crystal structure of Escherichia coli malate synthase G complexed with magnesium and glyoxylate at 2.0 angstrom resolution: Mechanistic implications, BIOCHEM, 39(11), 2000, pp. 3156-3168
The crystal structure of selenomethionine-substituted malate synthase G, an
81 kDa monomeric enzyme from Escherichia coli has been determined by MAD p
hasing, model building, and crysrallographic refinement to a resolution of
2.0 Angstrom. The crystallographic R factor is 0.177 for 49 242 reflections
observed at the incident wavelength of 1.008 Angstrom, and the model stere
ochemistry is satisfactory. The basic fold of the enzyme is that of a beta
8/alpha 8 (TIM) barrel. The barrel is centrally located, with an N-terminal
ex-helical domain flanking one side. An inserted beta-sheet domain folds a
gainst the opposite side of the barrel, and an alpha-helical C-terminal dom
ain forms a plug which caps the active site, Malate synthase catalyzes the
condensation of glyoxylate and acetyl-coenzyme A and hydrolysis of the inte
rmediate to yield malate and coenzyme A, requiring Mg2+ . The structure rev
eals an enzyme-substrate complex with glyoxylate and Mg2+ which coordinates
the aldehyde and carboxylate functions of the substrate, Two strictly cons
erved residues, Asp631 and Arg338, are proposed to provide concerted acid-b
ase chemistry for the generation of the enol(ate) intermediate of acetyl-co
enzyme A, while main-chain hydrogen bonds and bound Mg2+ polarize glyoxylat
e in preparation for nucleophilic attack. The catalytic strategy of malate
synthase appears to be essentially the same as that of citrate synthase, wi
th the electrophile activated for nucleophilic attack by nearby positive ch
arges and hydrogen bonds, while concerted acid-base catalysis accomplishes
the abstraction of a proton from the methyl group of acetyl-coenzyme A. An
active site aspartate is, however, the only common feature of these two enz
ymes, and the active sites of these enzymes are produced by quite different
protein folds. Interesting similarities in the overall folds and modes of
substrate recognition are discussed in comparisons of malate synthase with
pyruvate kinase and pyruvate phosphate dikinase.