Prognostic relavance of cerbB2 expression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients in a randomised trial of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy
Rk. Gregory et al., Prognostic relavance of cerbB2 expression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients in a randomised trial of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy, BREAST CANC, 59(2), 2000, pp. 171-175
Recent advances in the detection and treatment of breast cancer have led to
an intensive search for new markers of both prognosis and chemoresponsiven
ess. The oncogene cerbB2 has proved to be one of the most promising markers
currently under study, both as a predictor of chemoresponsiveness and as a
marker of poor prognosis. In addition the increasing use of neoadjuvant ch
emotherapy has led to the loss of standard prognostic criteria. In order to
study the potential role of cerbB2 expression as an indicator of chemoendo
crine resistance and poor prognosis, both before and after chemotherapy, we
obtained tumour sections from 283 women enrolled onto a neoadjuvant trial.
In this trial patients were randomised to receive either primary surgery f
ollowed by adjuvant chemoendocrine treatment or neoadjuvant chemoendocrine
therapy followed by surgery. CerbB2 status was determined immunohistochemic
ally on all of these patients. Thirty-eight percent of the tumours were cer
bB2 positive. There was no significant difference in expression between the
adjuvant (41%) and neoadjuvant arms (35%). CerbB2 positive patients were m
uch more likely to have shown non-response to chemoendocrine therapy (p < 0
.001) and had a worse DES (p < 0.05). The best prognosis was seen in cerbB2
negative patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy who showed
a significantly better DFS (p < 0.05), than the cerbB2 negative patients re
ceiving adjuvant therapy.