J. Ibojie et Sj. Urbaniak, Comparing near misses with actual mistransfusion events: a more accurate reflection of transfusion errors, BR J HAEM, 108(2), 2000, pp. 458-460
In a retrospective review of transfusion errors in a large teaching hospita
l, we found the true incidence of errors to be at least four times the actu
al mistransfusion events detected. Seventy-fine per cent: of the errors wer
e detected as near misses. The mistransfusions equated to 1/8610 compatibil
ity procedures, and 1/27 007 units of blood issued, whereas the number of t
rue transfusion errors equates to 1/2153 compatibility procedures and 1/675
2 units of blood issued. The major error-prone activities included patient
identification at phlebotomy and the final infusion of the blood product at
the bedside. Of the cases, 95.2% were due to non-compliance with existing
guidelines. Potential disasters were avoided only by the vigilance of the b
lood bank staff and the systems in place to detect errors.