Jb. Murdoch et al., The surgical management of cervical carcinoma within the South West of England: progress through an audit loop, BR J OBST G, 107(3), 2000, pp. 308-315
Objective To define and use a minimum clinical dataset for prospective data
collection in order to audit the surgical management of cervical cancer in
the South West of England. To compare this data set with a retrospective a
udit allowing assessment of the quality of care offered to patients.
Design prospective collection of a defined dataset on paper forms which wer
e put into a computerised database for analysis. Registrations validated ag
ainst histopathology databases and hospital coding.
Setting All 13 hospitals in the South West of England which participated in
the retrospective audit.
Participants One hundred and sixty-five women with cervical cancer diagnose
d in 1997.
Main outcome measures Distribution of cases by hospital and surgeon; worklo
ad of individual surgeons; adequacy and accuracy of FIGO staging; adequacy
of histological information; and adequacy of surgery.
Results There is a trend to centralisation of cancer care and radical surge
ry in the region. Prospective collection of data has dramatically improved
FIGO staging with 92% of all cases staged. for cases greater than Stage Ia,
98% were staged suggesting that a target of 100% staging is feasible, The
histological dimensions of tumours were not measured in a high proportion o
f cases (20% of tumour diameters and 28% of tumour thicknesses). Apparent i
nadequacies in surgical management are explored. In 10/165 cases (6%) inapp
ropriate conservative surgery may have been unavoidable, suggesting that a
quality standard of 95% for appropriate radical surgical management of cerv
ical cancer can be achieved. An anatomically complete removal of pelvic nod
e-bearing tissue, yielding greater than 10 nodes in more than 95% cases, sh
ould be achievable with each surgeon/pathologist achieving a mean of more t
han 20 nodes.
Conclusion Regional audit of cervical cancer management is feasible. II can
be used to improve the quality of information on management and guide impr
oved service provision.