The surgical management of cervical carcinoma within the South West of England: progress through an audit loop

Citation
Jb. Murdoch et al., The surgical management of cervical carcinoma within the South West of England: progress through an audit loop, BR J OBST G, 107(3), 2000, pp. 308-315
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
ISSN journal
14700328 → ACNP
Volume
107
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
308 - 315
Database
ISI
SICI code
1470-0328(200003)107:3<308:TSMOCC>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objective To define and use a minimum clinical dataset for prospective data collection in order to audit the surgical management of cervical cancer in the South West of England. To compare this data set with a retrospective a udit allowing assessment of the quality of care offered to patients. Design prospective collection of a defined dataset on paper forms which wer e put into a computerised database for analysis. Registrations validated ag ainst histopathology databases and hospital coding. Setting All 13 hospitals in the South West of England which participated in the retrospective audit. Participants One hundred and sixty-five women with cervical cancer diagnose d in 1997. Main outcome measures Distribution of cases by hospital and surgeon; worklo ad of individual surgeons; adequacy and accuracy of FIGO staging; adequacy of histological information; and adequacy of surgery. Results There is a trend to centralisation of cancer care and radical surge ry in the region. Prospective collection of data has dramatically improved FIGO staging with 92% of all cases staged. for cases greater than Stage Ia, 98% were staged suggesting that a target of 100% staging is feasible, The histological dimensions of tumours were not measured in a high proportion o f cases (20% of tumour diameters and 28% of tumour thicknesses). Apparent i nadequacies in surgical management are explored. In 10/165 cases (6%) inapp ropriate conservative surgery may have been unavoidable, suggesting that a quality standard of 95% for appropriate radical surgical management of cerv ical cancer can be achieved. An anatomically complete removal of pelvic nod e-bearing tissue, yielding greater than 10 nodes in more than 95% cases, sh ould be achievable with each surgeon/pathologist achieving a mean of more t han 20 nodes. Conclusion Regional audit of cervical cancer management is feasible. II can be used to improve the quality of information on management and guide impr oved service provision.