Evaluation of the benefits of monitoring fluid thickness in the dietary management of dysphagic stroke patients

Citation
R. Goulding et Amo. Bakheit, Evaluation of the benefits of monitoring fluid thickness in the dietary management of dysphagic stroke patients, CLIN REHAB, 14(2), 2000, pp. 119-124
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
02692155 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
119 - 124
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-2155(200004)14:2<119:EOTBOM>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Objective: Safe swallowing may be achieved in most patients with neurogenic dysphagia by manipulating the viscosity of ingested fluids. However, in cl inical practice fluids are thickened using subjective judgement. This may l ead to errors in the preparation of drinks to the prescribed viscosity. The aim of the present study is to examine whether the use of a viscometer imp roves the dietary management of dysphagic stroke patients. Study design: A randomized controlled study design was used. The speech and language therapist determined the optimal fluid thickness for each patient . The prescribed fluid viscosity for the study group was obtained using a v iscometer. Patients in the control group received fluids prepared according to current practice, i.e, the amount of thickener required to produce the prescribed viscosity was judged subjectively by the nursing staff. The two methods of fluid thickening were used for seven consecutive days. Assessmen t was made blind to randomization. Main outcome measure: Pulmonary aspiration, assessed clinically and with pu lse oximetry. If the patient did not drink all the fluid that was offered t he residue was measured. Results: Ten patients in the study group (n = 23) and nine in the control g roup (n = 23) aspirated. The mean viscosity of fluids offered to patients i n the control group was significantly higher than that of the study patient s. There was a statistically significant correlation between the viscosity and the residual volume of fluid (Pearson's test: r = 0.7, p < 0.02). The f indings of the study suggest that fluids prepared by subjectively assessing the amount of thickener required to produce a given consistency tend to ha ve a higher viscosity than those prepared using the viscometer. However, th e higher viscosity does not appear to protect against pulmonary aspiration and may lead to a reduced fluid intake. Conclusion: Manipulation of fluid thickness using objective measurements wi th a viscometer may improve the dietary management of dysphagic stroke pati ents.