Ai. Qureshi et al., Early predictors of outcome in patients receiving hypervolemic and hypertensive therapy for symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage, CRIT CARE M, 28(3), 2000, pp. 824-829
Objective: Symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is ass
ociated with a high incidence of permanent disability and death. For early
identification of patients who are at risk for poor outcome, we determined
the predictors of outcome in patients with symptomatic vasospasm after SAH.
Design: We retrospectively determined the prognostic value of clinical char
acteristics and computed tomographic scan both at admission and at the time
of initiation of hypervolemic and hypertensive therapy.
Settings: Neurosciences critical care unit at a University hospital.
Patients: A total of 70 consecutive patients who developed symptomatic vaso
spasm after SAH.
Intervention: Treatment with oral nimodipine, hypervolemic therapy, and hyp
ertensive therapy. Angioplasty and intra-arterial papaverine were used in p
atients with vasospasm resistant to standard treatment.
Measurements and Main Results: Poor outcome, defined as Glasgow Outcome Sca
le Score of 3-5 at 2 months or discharge, was observed in 32 (46%) patients
. In the logistic regression analysis, a Glasgow Coma Scare (GCS) score of
less than or equal to 11 (odds ratio, 11.0; 95% confidence interval, 3.6-39
.3) and hydrocephalus (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence Interval, 1.2-18.2)
at the time of initiation of hypervolemic and hypertensive therapy were sig
nificantly associated with poor outcome. Poor outcome was observed in 91% o
f the patients who had both a GCS score of less than or equal to 11 and hyd
rocephalus compared with 15% of patients with a GCS score of >11 and no hyd
rocephalus at the time of initiation of hypervolemic and hypertensive thera
py, a GCS score of less than or equal to 11 was also independently associat
ed with length of intensive care unit stay (F ratio = 18.0; p = .0011) and
hospital stay (F ratio = 9.2; p = .0034) after initiation of hypervolemic a
nd hypertensive therapy.
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that outcome in patients wit
h symptomatic vasospasm can be effectively predicted by routinely available
information, including GCS scare at the time of initiation of hypervolemic
and hypertensive therapy. This information can be used for selection and s
tratification of patients in future treatment studies of patients with symp
tomatic vasospasm.