Mc. Daly et al., Premiums and penalties for surplus and deficit education - Evidence from the United States and Germany, ECON ED REV, 19(2), 2000, pp. 169-178
An intriguing finding ih the literature on the role of education in the lab
or market concerns workers who have acquired either more or less education
than they say their jobs require. Contrary to predictions from a rigid, str
uctural view of jobs, several authors have found that the labor market rewa
rds workers for having completed more schooling than their jobs require and
penalizes workers who have 'too little' schooling. We investigate whether
the structural changes in the labor market in the United States over the 19
70s and 1980s (see Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (1992). US earnings levels and e
arnings inequality: a review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Jo
urnal of Economic Literature, 30, 1333-1381) affected the rewards and penal
ties associated with having too much or too little schooling for a job. We
then examine whether the same rewards and penalties for surplus and deficit
education observed in the United States apply in Germany, a country with a
much more structured educational system and labor market. We test explicit
ly for differences over time in the United States and at a point in time be
tween the United States and Germany. We find, consistent with a universalis
tic view of labor markets, more similarities across countries than over tim
e. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.