Research indicates that a significant proportion of the U.S. work force (be
tween 11% and 40% of white males) have more education than is actually requ
ired for their jobs, i.e. are overeducated. We consider overeducation in th
e context of the U.K. graduate labour market, using a one in six sample of
1980 U.K. graduates surveyed in 1986. We find that 38% of graduates were ov
ereducated for their first job and, even six years later (1986), 30% of the
sample were overeducated. Most of the literature in this field has estimat
ed the effect of overeducation on earnings and we confirm that the overeduc
ated earn less than their peers in graduate jobs, indicating that the retur
n on surplus education is less than the return on required education. We al
so frame two additional hypotheses based on human capital theory, related t
o the effects of degree class and sector, on the earnings of the overeducat
ed. We do not find support for a strict human capital interpretation of the
role of education in the U.K. graduate labour market and support an assign
ment model in which the characteristics of the job, as well as the individu
al, determine earnings. [JEL I21, J24] (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All r
ights reserved.