We employ Portuguese data to test two competing hypotheses about the impact
of overeducation and undereducation on earnings. First, undereducation is
the outcome of a process in which market-acquired capital substitutes for i
nsufficient school-supplied qualifications, whereas overeducation is associ
ated with excess schooling but short tenure and job experience. The second
hypothesis calls upon changes in the technology of production and marketing
to explain why some workers end up as inadequately educated for the tasks
that they perform, while at the same time, others (holding identical jobs b
ut more schooling) are perceived to be overeducated. Our findings appear to
leave little room for explanations of the overeducation/undereducation phe
nomenon rooted in the trade-off between different forms of human capital. T
he hypothesis of technology-induced pockets of overeducation and undereduca
tion is consistent with Portuguese reality, characterized in the last decad
e by intensive efforts to promote economic growth, to modernize the industr
ial structure and to upgrade educational qualifications. [JEL J24, I21, O30
] (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.