Es. Surrey et Wb. Schoolcraft, Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responderundergoing assisted reproductive techniques, FERT STERIL, 73(4), 2000, pp. 667-676
Objective: To assess the efficacy of various controlled ovarian hyperstimul
ation (COH) regimens in the prior poor-responder patient preparing for assi
sted reproductive techniques.
Design: English-language literature review.
Patient(s): Candidates for assisted reproductive techniques who had been de
fined as having a prior suboptimal response to standard COH regimens.
Intervention(s): A variety of regimes are reviewed, including increased gon
adotropin doses, change of gonadotropins, adjunctive growth hormone (GH), l
uteal phase (long) GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) initiation, early follicular phase
(flare) GnRH-a initiation, low-dose luteal phase (ultrashort) GnRH-a initi
ation, progestin pretreatment, and microdose flare GnRH-a initiation.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Maximal serum E-2 levels, follicular development,
dose, and duration of gonadotropin therapy, cycle cancellation rates, oocyt
es retrieved, embryos: transferred, and clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate
s.
Result(s): A lack of uniformity in definition of the poor responder and of
prospective randomized trials make data interpretation somewhat difficult.
Of the varied strategies proposed, those that seem to be more uniformly ben
eficial are microdose GnRH-a flare and late luteal phase initiation of a sh
ort course of low-dose GnRH-a discontinued before COH.
Conclusion(s): No single regimen will benefit all poor responders. General
acceptance of uniform definitions and performance of large-scale prospectiv
e randomized trials an critical. Development of a reliable precycle screen
will allow effective differentiation among normal responders, poor responde
rs, and those who will not conceive with their own oocytes.