M. Fukuda et al., Does anovulation induced by oral contraceptives favor pregnancy during thefollowing two menstrual cycles?, FERT STERIL, 73(4), 2000, pp. 742-747
Objective: To compare IVF and pregnancy outcomes before and after anovulati
on induced by oral contraceptives.
Design: Observational clinical study.
Setting: Infertility clinic.
Patient(s): Forty women with two intact ovaries (32 of 40 couples with male
factor infertility and 8 with unknown causes of infertility) underwent 190
IVF treatment cycles (55 natural cycles and 135 clomiphene citrate-stimula
ted cycles).
Intervention(s): If the women failed to conceive after 2-4 IVF treatment cy
cles, oral contraceptives were used to induce anovulation for 1 month befor
e IVF was performed in two consecutive cycles.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Rates of oocyte retrieval, fertilization, cleavage
, preembryo formation, pregnancy, and implantation were compared before and
after a period of anovulation,
Result(s): The pregnancy rate per cycle of the first and second cycle combi
ned (23%) and that of the second cycle alone (30%) after a period of anovul
ation were significantly higher than that observed before a period of anovu
lation (9%).
Conclusion(s): Anovulation induced by oral contraceptives, showing bilatera
l ovarian quiescence, enhances pregnancy rates in the following two menstru
al cycles of IVF treatment.