Objective To compare the results of falloposcopic and histopathological exa
mination of diseased fallopian tubes in order to assess the diagnostic qual
ity of falloposcopy.
Subjects Five infertile patients with known, severe tubal pathology, which
was considered to be irreversible and unsuitable for reconstructive surgery
.
Interventions Falloposcopy followed by a bilateral salpingectomy, as prepar
ation for in vitro fertilization. Serial cuts of the different segments of
the 10 tubes were then prepared for histopathological examination. The hist
opathological findings were compared in blind fashion to the falloposcopic
results. The pathomorphological criteria for both were the luminal geometry
, status of the mucosal surface, fold architecture and intraluminal finding
s.
Results The sensitivity of falloposcopy was 100% for the evaluation of lumi
nal geometry, the mucosa and fold architecture. For intraluminal pathology,
the sensitivity was 75% and the specificity was 100%.
Conclusion In cases of severe tubal pathology, falloposcopy is an accurate
diagnostic examination. However, its capacity to detect intraluminal pathol
ogy needs to be improved.