I. Mollaret et al., Phylogeny of the Monopisthocotylea and Polyopisthocotylea (Platyhelminthes) inferred from 28S rDNA sequences, INT J PARAS, 30(2), 2000, pp. 171-185
This study focuses on the phylogenetic relationships within the Polyopistho
cotylea and Monopisthocotylea, two groups that are often grouped within the
monogeneans, a group of disputed paraphyly. Phylogenetic analyses were con
ducted with multiple outgroups chosen according to two hypotheses, a paraph
yletic Monogenea or a monophyletic Monogenea, and with three methods, namel
y maximum parsimony, neighbour joining and maximum likelihood. Sequences us
ed were from the partial domain C1, full doXmain D1, and partial domain C2
(550 nucleotides, 209 unambiguously aligned sites) from the 28S ribosomal R
NA gene for 16 species of monopisthocotyleans, 26 polyopisthocotyleans incl
uding six polystomatids, and other Platyhelminthes (61 species in total, 27
new sequences). Results were similar with outgroups corresponding to the t
wo hypotheses. Within the Monopisthocotylea, relationships were: (((Udonell
a, capsalids), monocotylids), (diplectanids, ancyrocephalids)); each of the
se families was found to be monophyletic and their monophyly was supported
by high bootstrap values in neighbour joining and maximum parsimony. Within
the Polyopisthocotylea, the polystomatids were the sister-group of all oth
ers. Among the latter, Hexabothrium, parasite of chondrichthyans, was the m
ost basal, and the mazocraeids, mainly parasites of clupeomorph teleosts, w
ere the sister-groups of all other studied polyopisthocotyleans, these, mai
nly parasites of euteleosts, being polytomous. (C) 2000 Australian Society
for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Science. All rights reserved.