Dose response study of subarachnoid diamorphine for analgesia after elective caesarean section

Citation
Rwh. Skilton et al., Dose response study of subarachnoid diamorphine for analgesia after elective caesarean section, INT J OB AN, 8(4), 1999, pp. 231-235
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA
ISSN journal
0959289X → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
231 - 235
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-289X(199910)8:4<231:DRSOSD>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Subarachnoid diamorphine provides excellent analgesia after elective caesar ean section but the optimum dose is still uncertain. We therefore investiga ted the effects of three regimens of subarachnoid diamorphine. Forty partur ients were assigned to one of four groups. A control group received no diam orphine in their subarachnoid bupivacaine and three study groups received 0 .1 mg, 0.2 mg or 0.3 mg diamorphine added to 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in a semi-blind randomised design study. All women received a 100 mg diclofenac suppository at the end of the caesarean section and were provide d with morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA) postoperatively. The pat ients were assessed for pain, morphine usage and side-effects at 2, 4, 8 an d 24 h after the subarachnoid injection. Postoperative visual analogue scor es for pain and PCA morphine consumption were significantly lower, and mean time to first use of morphine was significantly longer in the 0.3 mg diamo rphine group. The mean (SD) dose of PCA morphine used over 24 h was 39.4 (1 4.7), 25.6 (16.5), 21.6 (15.9) and 3.1 (3.6) mg, and mean time to first use of morphine was 1.6 (0.5), 3.0 (1.4), 3.4 (2.4) and 14.1 (9.4) h, in the 0 , 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg and 0.3 mg groups respectively. Side-effects of pruritus, nausea and vomiting were dependent on the dose of spinal diamorphine but di d not require treatment in any patients. We conclude that 0.3 mg subarachno id diamorphine provides significantly better postoperative pain relief than the smaller doses with an acceptable increase in side-effects. (C) 1999 Ha rcourt Publishers Ltd.