Effectiveness and acceptability of a domiciliary multidrug inhalation treatment in elderly patients with chronic airflow obstruction: Metered dose inhaler versus jet nebulizer
G. Balzano et al., Effectiveness and acceptability of a domiciliary multidrug inhalation treatment in elderly patients with chronic airflow obstruction: Metered dose inhaler versus jet nebulizer, J AEROSOL M, 13(1), 2000, pp. 25-33
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG
The aim of this study was to compare the immediate and long-term bronchodil
ator effect as well as the patient acceptability of a 2-week, multidrug, in
halation treatment delivered by a metered dose inhaler (MDI) versus a jet n
ebulizer in a group of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD) or asthma and an at least partially reversible airflow obstr
uction. Twenty elderly outpatients (17 men; mean +/- SD age, 67 +/- 2 years
; mean +/- SD baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], 46.5 +/
- 14% of predicted value) with COPD or asthma participated in the study, wh
ich was of an open, randomized, crossover design. After a 1-day baseline ev
aluation, including patient history, clinical examination, and spirometry,
participants were randomly assigned to receive a multidrug inhalation treat
ment (a combination of salbutamol, ipratropium, and flunisolide) with eithe
r an MDI or a jet nebulizer. Two weeks later, they were shifted to treatmen
t with the alternative system for a further 2 weeks. FEV1 was measured on t
he first and fourteenth days of each treatment period, on each occasion bot
h before and 30 minutes after the morning inhalation. At the end of the stu
dy, patients were asked to express a personal preference for one of the two
inhalation treatments with regard to effectiveness and acceptability by fi
lling out a simple questionnaire. Both the MDI and jet nebulizer had a sign
ificant immediate bronchodilator effect on the first and fourteenth days of
treatment, with no differences between treatments. No long-term bronchodil
ator effect was seen with either aerosol delivery system. Patient preferenc
es were clearly in favor of the jet nebulizer with regard to effectiveness
and in favor of the MDI with regard to acceptability. In conclusion, in eld
erly patients with COPD or asthma and partially reversible airflow obstruct
ion, a maintenance multidrug bronchodilator/anti-inflammatory inhalation tr
eatment produced a statistically significant and clinically relevant bronch
odilator effect without substantial differences between the two delivery sy
stems. Most patients considered the MDI to be more acceptable and the jet n
ebulizer to be more effective. These preferences should be taken into consi
deration when prescribing a maintenance aerosol inhalation treatment.