L. Litcher et al., School and neuropsychological performance of evacuated children in Kyiv 11years after the Chornobyl disaster, J CHILD PSY, 41(3), 2000, pp. 291-299
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES
This paper examines the cognitive and neuropsychological functioning of chi
ldren who were in utero to age IS months at the time of the Chornobyl disas
ter and were evacuated to Kyiv from the 30-kilometer zone surrounding the p
lant. Specifically, we compared 300 evacuee children at ages 10-12 with 300
non-evacuee Kyiv classmates on objective and subjective measures of attent
ion, memory, and school performance. The evacuee children were not signific
antly different from their classmates on the objective measures (grades; Sy
mbolic Relations subtest of the Detroit Test; forms 1 and 2 of the Visual S
earch and Attention Test; Benton Form Al Trails A: Underline the Words Test
) or on most of the subjective measures (the attention subscale of the Chil
d Behavior Checklist completed by mothers, the attention items of the Iowa
Conners Teacher's Rating Scale; mother and child perceptions of school perf
ormance). The one exception was that 31.3% of evacuee mothers compared to 7
.4% of classmate mothers indicated that their child had a memory problem. H
owever, this subjective measure of memory problems was not significantly re
lated to neuropsychological or school performance. No significant differenc
es were found in comparisons of evacuees and classmates who were in utero a
t the time of the explosion, children from Pripyat vs. other villages in th
e 30-kilometer zone? and children manifesting greater generalized anxiety.
For both groups, children with greater Chornobyl-focused anxiety performed
significantly worse than children with less Chornobyl-focused anxiety on me
asures of attention. The results thus fail to confirm two previous reports
that relatively more children from areas contaminated by radiation had cogn
itive deficits compared to controls. Possible reasons for the differences i
n findings among the studies are discussed.