H. Tilly et al., Randomized comparison of ACVBP and m-BACOD in the treatment of patients with low-risk aggressive lymphoma: The LNH87-1 study, J CL ONCOL, 18(6), 2000, pp. 1309-1315
Purpose: To compare ct short intensified regimen followed by sequential con
solidation therapy (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, an
d prednisone [ACVBP]) to the standard regimen of methotrexate, bleomycin, c
yclophosphamide, and etoposide (m-BACOD) in patients with low-risk aggressi
ve lymphoma.
Patients and Methods: A total of 752 patients with intermediate or high-gra
de lymphoma and no adverse prognostic factors (Eastern Cooperative Oncology
Group performance status of 2 to 4, greater than or equal to two extranoda
l sites of disease, tumor burden greater than or equal to 10 cm in largest
dimension, bone marrow or CNS involvement, Burkitt's or lymphoblastic subty
pes) were registered. Of 673 eligible patients, 332 received ACVBP and 341
received m-BACOD.
Results: The complete remission rate wets identical (86%) in the two groups
. With a median follow-up duration of 7 years, the 5-year failure-free surv
ival (FFS) rate wets 65% in the ACVBP group and 61% in the m-BACOD group (P
= .16), The 5-year overall survival rate wets 75% in the ACVBP group and 7
3% in the m-BACOD group (P = .47). ACVBP was responsible for more severe an
d life-threatening infections (P < .01), but m-BACOD caused more pulmonary
toxicity (P < .001). The number of treatment-related deaths did not differ
between the two regimens. A multivariate analysis indicated that ACVBP wets
associated with a longer FFS in patients with two or three risk factors of
the International Prognostic Index.
Conclusion: In this population of patients with low-risk aggressive lymphom
a, toxicities of the regimens are different, but the rates of response and
survival are identical. The survival advantage of ACVBP over standard regim
en in patients with advanced disease is suggested by this analysis but rema
ins to be assessed in prospective studies specifically designed for this pu
rpose. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology,