Signal characteristics of focal liver lesions on double echo T2-weighted conventional spin echo MRI: Observer performance versus quantitative measurements of T2 relaxation times
Hm. Fenlon et al., Signal characteristics of focal liver lesions on double echo T2-weighted conventional spin echo MRI: Observer performance versus quantitative measurements of T2 relaxation times, J COMPUT AS, 24(2), 2000, pp. 204-211
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Purpose: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the ability of expert rea
ders to differentiate benign from malignant liver lesions based on visual a
ssessment of lesion signal intensity on double echo T2-weighted conventiona
l spin echo (CSE) MR images and to compare reader performance with quantita
tive measurements of T2 relaxation times.
Method: Sixty-seven MR examinations demonstrating 85 liver lesions (37 hema
ngiomas, 32 malignancies, 15 cysts, and 1 focal nodular hyperplasia) on dou
ble echo T2-weighted CSE sequences (TR 3,600 ms/TE 50, 160 ms) were qualita
tively reviewed by three independent readers. T2 relaxation tines were calc
ulated for each lesion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses of
expert readers were compared with calculated T2 relaxation times.
Results: T2 values performed significantly better than subjective reader an
alysis for Liver lesion characterization (area under ROC = 0.93 vs. 0.81, 0
.78, and 0.75; p < 0.0001). With use of a T2 threshold of 125 ms, the sensi
tivity of T2 values for malignant lesions was 100%, specificity 71%, and ac
curacy 84%. By comparison, the sensitivity of the three readers for maligna
nt lesions was 76-83%, with a specificity of 61-72% and an overall accuracy
of 71-80%.
Conclusion: Despite expert reader analyses, subjective evaluations of liver
lesion signal characteristics are prone to inaccuracy and lack certainty a
nd consistency when intermediate TEs (50/160 ms) are used. Quantitative mea
surements of T2 relaxation times should be performed to accurately and conf
idently differentiate: benign from malignant liver lesions. Use of a higher
T2 threshold than previously recommended is required to avoid misclassific
ation of malignancies.