IDENTIFICATION OF DOMAINS CONFERRING LIGAND-BINDING SPECIFICITY TO THE PROSTANOID RECEPTOR - STUDIES ON CHIMERIC PROSTACYCLIN PROSTAGLANDIN-D RECEPTORS/
T. Kobayashi et al., IDENTIFICATION OF DOMAINS CONFERRING LIGAND-BINDING SPECIFICITY TO THE PROSTANOID RECEPTOR - STUDIES ON CHIMERIC PROSTACYCLIN PROSTAGLANDIN-D RECEPTORS/, The Journal of biological chemistry, 272(24), 1997, pp. 15154-15160
To identify domains conferring ligand binding specificity to prostanoi
d receptors, we constructed a series of chimeric receptors by successi
vely replacing the regions from the carboxyl-terminal tail of mouse pr
ostacyclin (prostaglandin I (PGI)) receptor (mIP) with the correspondi
ng regions of the mouse PGD receptor (mDP), The mIP receptor expressed
in COS 7 cells bound [H-3]iloprost, a PGI(2) analog and [H-3]PGE(1) w
ith K-d values of 13 and 27 nM, respectively, This receptor did not bi
nd [H-3]PGD(2), [H-3]PGE(2), and [H-3]PGF(2 alpha). The mDP receptor b
ound only [H-3]PGD(2) with a K-d value of 43 nM, The chimeric IPN-VII/
DPC receptor with replacement of the carboxyl tail of the mIP receptor
with that of the mDP receptor showed 12-16-fold higher affinities for
[H-3]iloprost and [H-3]PGE(1) than the mIP receptor, The region exten
ding from the sixth transmembrane domain to the carboxyl terminus of t
he mIP receptor was next replaced with the corresponding region of the
mDP receptor, This chimeric IPN-V/DPVI-C receptor acquired the abilit
y to bind [H-3]PGD(2) and [H-3]PGE(2) without decreasing the affinitie
s of the mIP receptor to [H-3]iloprost and [H-3]PGE(1). These binding
characteristics did not change when the fourth and fifth transmembrane
domains of the mIP receptor were further replaced with She correspond
ing regions of the mDP receptor, However, when the first extracellular
to second intracellular loop of the mIP receptor containing the third
transmembrane domain was further replaced with those of the mDP recep
tor, the affinities for [H-3]PGE(1), [H-3]PGE(2), and [3H]iloprost wer
e markedly decreased, whereas that far [H-3]PGD(2) was increased by ab
out 2-fold, [H-3]PGF(2 alpha) showed no affinity for the mIP, mDP, and
all the chimeric receptors. These results suggest that She sixth to s
eventh transmembrane domain of the mIP receptor confers the specificit
y of this receptor to bind selectively to PGE(1) and not to PGE(2) and
that the third transmembrane domain of the mDP, receptor confers the
selective binding of PGD(2) to this receptor.