So. Andreasen et al., Role of CD40 ligand and CD28 in induction and maintenance of antiviral CD8(+) effector T cell responses, J IMMUNOL, 164(7), 2000, pp. 3689-3697
The primary aim of this report was to evaluate the immune responses of CD40
ligand-deficient (CD40L(-/-)) mice infected with two viruses known to diff
er markedly in their capacity to replicate in the host. Lymphocytic choriom
eningitis virus (LCMV) is a natural mouse pathogen that replicates widely a
nd extensively, whereas vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) spreads poorly. We
found that the primary response of CD40L(-/-) mice toward VSV is significa
ntly impaired; proliferation of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells is reduced 2-
to 3-fold, few CD8(+) cells acquire an activated phenotype, and little func
tional activity is induced. Very similar results were obtained in VSV-infec
ted, CD28-deficient mice. In contrast, neither CD40L nor CD28 was required
for induction of a primary CD8(+) response toward LCMV, Surprisingly, lack
of CD4(+) T cells had no impact on the primary immune response toward any o
f the viruses, even though the CD40 ligand dependence demonstrated for VSV
would be expected to be associated with CD4 dependence. Upon coinfection of
VSV-infected mice with LCMV, the requirement for CD40 ligand (but not CD28
) could be partially bypassed, as evidenced by a 3-fold increase in the fre
quency of VSV specific CD8(+) T cells on day 6 postinfection, Finally, desp
ite the fact that the primary LCMV-specific CDS' response is virtually unim
paired in CD40L(-/-) mice, their capacity to maintain CD8(+) effector activ
ity and to permanently control the infection is significantly reduced. Thus
, our results demonstrate that the importance of CD40/CD40L interaction for
activation of CD8(+) T cells varies between viruses and over time.