In this paper I explore the relevance of neo-republican thinking for curren
t debates in constitutional law. In particular, I am interested in how deli
berative forms of law and democracy might be grounded in real-world institu
tional contexts. My thesis is that the neo-republican model, underpinned as
it is by the values of equality, participation, and accountability, has bo
th explanatory and critical potential when exploring the voices, spaces, an
d processes of constitutionalism I test this argument with reference to con
stitutional change in Northern Ireland It is evident that equality is the c
ore value in the settlement reached but it is in the combination of values
that the potential and tensions will arise in the future. The provisions of
the Northern Ireland Act 1998 on equality are useful examples of how law m
ight be shaped to include the voices of affected groups in the process of e
nforcing change in public administration. Law's role in this process is, ho
wever, move problematic than is often assumed In this, and in other aspects
of the settlement, there are lessons for others who are presently reflecti
ng on the constitutional future in the new devolutionary contexts.