Numerical prediction of the limiting draw ratio for aluminum alloy sheet

Citation
Et. Harpell et al., Numerical prediction of the limiting draw ratio for aluminum alloy sheet, J MATER PR, 100(1-3), 2000, pp. 131-141
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Material Science & Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
09240136 → ACNP
Volume
100
Issue
1-3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
131 - 141
Database
ISI
SICI code
0924-0136(20000403)100:1-3<131:NPOTLD>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The numerical prediction of limiting draw ratio (LDR) using an explicit dyn amic finite element code, LS-DYNA, is presented. A series of 10 different t ooling geometries were modelled for a cylindrical-cup-drawing process, with the differences being variations in the die and punch profile radii. Three phenomenological yield criteria incorporating rolling-induced crystallogra phic texture effects (the Lankford coefficient and the yield exponent) are considered and their effect on the predicted strain distributions within dr awn cups is assessed through comparison with measured strains. In general, transverse anisotropy is shown to have a large influence on the predicted s trains whereas the influence of in-plane anisotropy is small. Reasonable ag reement with measured;strains is obtained using the Barlat-89 non-quadratic yield criterion. The LDR is predicted based on two methods: (i) proximity to the forming lim it as characterized by a forming limit ratio (FLR) parameter calculated usi ng predicted principal strains; and (ii) attainment of the peak punch force (PPF) corresponding to the maximum blank size that can be drawn into the d ie cavity without necking. The predicted LDR was in good agreement with tha t from experiment for tooling profile radii greater than 3 mm; however, the PPF method was less sensitive to variations in punch profile radius than w ere the FLR-based predictions. For the sharp 3 mm die radius tooling, the m odel over-predicts the LDR (unconservative) which suggests a change in the failure mechanism to a bending failure, since the bend radius-to-thickness ratio approaches the bendability limit for AA5754-O. (C) 2000 Elsevier Scie nce S.A. All rights reserved.