Pc. Albertsen et al., The positive yield of imaging studies in the evaluation of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: A population based analysis, J UROL, 163(4), 2000, pp. 1138-1143
Purpose: We determine the positive yield of imaging studies performed on me
n with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Materials and Methods: A prospective, population based survey was conducted
on 3,690 men with prostate cancer diagnosed between October 1, 1994, and O
ctober 31, 1995. Cases were identified by the rapid case ascertainment syst
ems used in 6 geographic regions participating in the Surveillance, Epidemi
ology and End Results Program. Based on information captured in primary med
ical record reviews we estimated the positive yield of bone scans, computer
ized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging.
Results: The positive yield of bone scan and CT was less than 5% and 12%, r
espectively, for all men with prostate specific antigen (PSA) 4 to 20 ng./m
l., and less than 2% and 9%, respectively, for those who also had a Gleason
score of 6 or less. Only men with PSA greater than 50 ng./ml. and those wi
th Gleason scores 8 to 10 and PSA greater than 20 ng./ml. had positive yiel
ds greater than 10% and 20% for bone scan and CT, respectively.
Conclusions: Imaging studies designed to identify metastases and/or extraca
psular extension in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer frequently hav
e a low positive yield. Wide variations exist in the use of imaging studies
and are associated with tumor factors, such as Gleason score and serum PSA
, and nontumor factors, such as state of residence. More extensive cost-eff
ectiveness analyses are needed to define appropriate guidelines for orderin
g imaging studies to optimize the positive yield among men with newly diagn
osed prostate cancer.