Bc. Leibovich et al., Benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with apositive surgical margin, J UROL, 163(4), 2000, pp. 1178-1182
Purpose: Positive surgical margins are common after radical prostatectomy,
and the role of adjuvant therapy in such cases is controversial. We determi
ned the benefit of postoperative external beam radiation therapy in patient
s with margin positive prostate cancer with respect to biochemical progress
ion or cancer recurrence. To decrease confounding factors that may affect t
he likelihood of biochemical progression our study was limited to men with
organ confined cancer and a single positive margin.
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the records of a nested
matched cohort of 76 patients with pathological stage T2N0 prostate cancer
and a single positive margin who underwent adjuvant radiation therapy with
in 3 months of radical prostatectomy. There was a positive margin at the pr
ostatic apex in 35 cases, prostatic base in 18, posterior prostate in 11, u
rethra in 7, and prostatic apex and urethra in 5. These patients were match
ed 1:1 with 76 controls who did not receive adjuvant radiation therapy. Nei
ther group received androgen deprivation therapy. Patients and controls wer
e matched exactly for the margin positive site, age at surgery, preoperativ
e serum prostate specific antigen, Gleason score and DNA ploidy. Biochemica
l relapse was defined as posttreatment PSA greater than 0.2 ng./ml.
Results: Overall there was significant estimated improvement plus or minus
standard error in 5-year clinical and biochemical progression-free survival
in 88% +/- 5% versus 59% +/- 11% of patients treated with adjuvant radiati
on therapy versus no radiation therapy (p = 0.005). No patient who received
radiation therapy had local or distant recurrence, while 16% of controls h
ad recurrence (p = 0.015). When stratified by site of margin positivity, th
e 5-year estimated clinical and biochemical progression-free rate in 18 cas
es and controls with a positive base margin was 95% +/- 15% and 65% +/- 13%
respectively (p = 0.02). The rate in 35 cases and cases with a positive ap
ex margin was 95% +/- 5% and 64% +/- 15%, respectively (p = 0.07). Limited
sample size precluded analysis of the other sites.
Conclusions: Patients with localized prostate cancer and a singe positive s
urgical margin appear to have a lower rate of biochemical relapse at 5 year
s when adjuvant radiation therapy is administered. Defmitive evidence of th
e beneficial effect of adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with involve
d surgical margins awaits conclusion of randomized clinical trials.