Interferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C non-responders to recombinant alpha-interferon

Citation
G. Bresci et al., Interferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C non-responders to recombinant alpha-interferon, J VIRAL HEP, 7(1), 2000, pp. 75-78
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS
ISSN journal
13520504 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
75 - 78
Database
ISI
SICI code
1352-0504(200001)7:1<75:IPRICH>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the most appropriate therapeutic prot ocol for patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to a previous cou rse of recombinant interferon alpha-2b (rIFN). Sixty patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 subjects each: group A was treated with doubl e dose of the same type of rIFN (6 MU t.i.w.) plus ribavirin for 6 months; group B was treated with the same rIFN dose and duration as group A, but wi thout ribavirin. An end of treatment complete response (ETCR) was defined a s alanine transaminase (ALT) normalization with undetectable serum HCV-RNA at the end of the treatment, while an end of treatment biochemical response (ETBR) as ALT normalization with still detectable viraemia. The two groups were homogeneous. The patients with ETCR or ETBR were than followed-up for at least 1 year. A sustained biochemical response (SBR) was defined as the persistence of normal ALT with still detectable viraemia after a 12-month follow-up, and a sustained complete response (SCR) as the persistence of no rmal ALT with undetectable viraemia. Side-effects were only observed in pat ients treated with rIFN plus ribavirin: four cases (13%) discontinued the t herapy owing to haemolytic anaemia. Combination therapy induced an ETCR in 11 patients (37%) and an ETBR in six (20%), while a SCR was observed in two subjects (7%) and a SBR in four (13%). The use of a double dose of rIFN al one obtained an ETCR in four cases (13%) and an ETBR in five (17%), with a SCR in two (7%) and a SBR in three (10%). Hence, both combination therapy a nd single treatment with higher rIFN doses were unable to show statisticall y significant long-term benefits in patients with chronic hepatitis C resis tant to a previous course of rIFN treatment.