When bisecting lines, an important number of brain damaged patients tend to
place their bisection marks in the hemispace ipsilateral to their lesion.
Biases have also been reported in normal adults. In vertical bisection both
patients and normal subjects present with upward shifts, although a downwa
rd displacement may occur eventually. Surprisingly, little is known on line
bisection (LB) in normal or brain damaged children. A total of 650 subject
s, aged 7-12 years, performed a horizontal and vertical LB task with their
preferred hand. Asymmetry indices (AIs) were used to measure directional bi
ns. Unsigned Als served to evaluate accuracy and mastery of the LB skill. I
n vertical bisection a general and significant upward bias was found, where
as in horizontal bisection subject (gender. handedness, utilized hand, age)
and stimulus variables (orientation, length, position) yielded significant
ly different AIs. Although with increasing age significantly increasing acc
uracy was observed, none of the participating children mastered LB to mathe
matical precision. Differences in IQ-level and attention lest score did not
yield significantly different AIs. Impact from reading proficiency could n
ot be demonstrated. It is suggested that stimulus length effect results are
compatible with the Halligan and Marshall [Halligan, P., and Marshall, J.
Toward a principled explanation of unilateral neglect. Cognitive Neuropsych
ology, 1994, 11, 167-206] model of hemispatial neglect. Moreover, data may
support the hypothesis of greater hemispheric specialization of visuo-spati
al skills in boys than in girls. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights
reserved.