Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of recurrent atrial fibrillation

Citation
Pe. Dilaveris et al., Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of recurrent atrial fibrillation, PACE, 23(3), 2000, pp. 352-358
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01478389 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
352 - 358
Database
ISI
SICI code
0147-8389(200003)23:3<352:CAEPOR>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Patients with frequent episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) are prone to develop permanent AF and have an increased thromboembolic risk. We have previously shown that P wave dispersion (P dispersion), defined as th e difference between the maximum and the minimum P wave duration, and maxim um P wave duration (P maximum) can distinguish patients with paroxysmal lon e AF. The ability of those ECC markers and of other clinical and ECG variab les to detect patients at risk for recurrent AF was tested in 88 patients, aged 64 +/- 12 years. All patients had a history of symptomatic episodes of AF during the last 2 years and had not previously received any antiarrhyth mic prophylaxis. P maximum and P dispersion were calculated from a 12-lead surface ECG recorded in all patients during sinus rhythm. A computerized EC G system was used and P maximum and P dispersion were calculated on screen from the averaged complexes of all 12 leads. Age (P = 0.01), history of org anic heart disease (P = 0.03), P maximum (P < 0.001), minimum P wave durati on (P = 0.05), and P dispersion (P < 0.001) were found to be significant un ivariate predictors of recurrent AF, whereas only P maximum (P < 0.001) and age (P = 0.037) remained significant independent predictors of frequent AF paroxysms in the multivariate analysis. it is concluded that advanced age and prolonged P wave duration may be used as predictors of frequently relap sing AF. Therefore, simple AF predictors exist that could possibly distingu ish the patients in whom prophylaxis with antiarrhythmic medicines should b e instituted.