The ancient Greeks almost universally accepted the thesis that virtues are
skills. Skills have an underlying intellectual structure (logos), and havin
g a particular skill entails understanding the relevant logos, possessing a
general ability to diagnose and solve problems (phronesis), as well as hav
ing appropriate experience. Two implications of accepting this thesis for m
oral epistemology and epistemology in general are considered. Thinking of v
irtues as skills yields a viable virtue epistemology in which moral knowled
ge is a species of a general kind of knowledge that is not philosophically
suspect. Also, the debate between internalists and externalists in epistemo
logy is subversively resolved as moot by adopting this strategy: the locus
of justification for a belief is in the nature of skill. Thus, the continge
nt fact that some skills allow Homo Sapiens an 'internal access,' while oth
ers do not, is theoretically neutral when considering the nature of justifi
cation per se.